Rename AbstractIndexCache to be more accurate
This commit is contained in:
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ public class ItemContainer extends Node {
|
||||
@ObfuscatedSignature(
|
||||
signature = "Lit;"
|
||||
)
|
||||
static IndexCache field434;
|
||||
static Archive field434;
|
||||
@ObfuscatedName("f")
|
||||
@Export("ids")
|
||||
int[] ids;
|
||||
@@ -55,18 +55,18 @@ public class ItemContainer extends Node {
|
||||
if (var1 != null) {
|
||||
return var1;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
AbstractIndexCache var2 = SequenceDefinition.field773;
|
||||
AbstractIndexCache var3 = SequenceDefinition.field774;
|
||||
AbstractArchive var2 = SequenceDefinition.field773;
|
||||
AbstractArchive var3 = SequenceDefinition.field774;
|
||||
boolean var4 = true;
|
||||
int[] var5 = var2.method3(var0);
|
||||
|
||||
for (int var6 = 0; var6 < var5.length; ++var6) {
|
||||
byte[] var7 = var2.getRecord(var0, var5[var6]);
|
||||
byte[] var7 = var2.getFile(var0, var5[var6]);
|
||||
if (var7 == null) {
|
||||
var4 = false;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
int var8 = (var7[0] & 255) << 8 | var7[1] & 255;
|
||||
byte[] var9 = var3.getRecord(var8, 0);
|
||||
byte[] var9 = var3.getFile(var8, 0);
|
||||
if (var9 == null) {
|
||||
var4 = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user